Every vendor relationship a community relies on, from routine landscaping to a multimillion-dollar restoration, ultimately rests on paperwork, which is why managing contracts with care is one of the most practical skills a Florida board can build. We recently hosted a CEU course featuring Ed Hammel of Sachs Sax Caplan, who led board members and property managers through the details that separate an enforceable agreement from an expensive misunderstanding.
This webinar examined the full life of an association contract, from deciding when a written agreement is even necessary to vetting a vendor's coverage, negotiating essential terms, and protecting the community if the work later goes wrong. Attendees also explored how bonds, attorney review, board approval, and Florida's construction lien laws fit into a smarter, more disciplined approach to association management.
Disclaimer: This video is for educational purposes only. You will not receive credits for watching the recording. Credits were issued only to those that attended the course.
If you enjoyed this video, check out our YouTube channel and subscribe to view all of our educational videos relating to community association management in Florida.
The simplest test for whether a vendor relationship needs a written agreement is to ask how many times the association is willing to pay for the same work. A contract exists to record each party's rights, remedies, and obligations, so responsibilities are clear long before any disagreement arises. That reasoning holds whether the job is a five-thousand-dollar pool pump replacement or a multimillion-dollar rebuild.
Not every agreement demands the same scrutiny, and the time counsel and management invest should scale with the size and complexity of the work. A small service call does not need the review a major construction contract requires, yet every agreement, regardless of value, should still address a minimum set of protections. Treating even routine purchases as real contracts is what keeps a community from operating on handshake terms that fall apart under pressure.
Custom or special-order items deserve particular attention, because they often involve large deposits and long lead times. When a community commits significant money to a one-of-a-kind component built to order, the agreement should account for that exposure with its own protections rather than folding it into a vague scope. Anticipating those risks in writing protects the association's money if the supplier or contractor fails to deliver.
Before any contract is signed, the vendor itself has to be vetted, and that begins with confirming insurance and licensing. These checks are the foundation everything else in the agreement builds on.
The first step is collecting current certificates of insurance and confirming they cover every applicable category, including general liability, automobile, umbrella, workers' compensation, employer's liability, and pollution coverage where relevant. Coverage is not always listed on a single certificate; when a vendor uses different carriers for its umbrella or auto policies, those appear on separate certificates that all need to be gathered. Missing one category can leave a gap exactly where a claim later lands.
The most common and costly mistake in this area is assuming a certificate of insurance makes the association an additional insured. A certificate can name the association and still confer no rights, because only a policy endorsement issued by the carrier actually adds the association to the vendor's coverage. That endorsement usually arrives either as an automatic rider attached to the policy or as a letter from the carrier confirming the association's status for the specific project, and pairing it with primary and non-contributory language keeps the vendor's policy responding first. Reviewing HOA vendor contracts in Florida with this distinction in mind is what ensures the risk is genuinely transferred.
Alongside insurance, a vendor's licensing should be verified directly through the state rather than a county registration, using Florida's DBPR records. For trades where state licensing is required, such as general contractors, roofers, plumbers, and electricians, confirming that the license matches the company actually performing the work prevents problems when a contractor operates under a different or fictitious name. When a license cannot be located, that is a red flag worth raising with counsel before moving forward.
“The certificate of insurance might even say so-and-so, XYZ Association, is an additional insured on the liability policies. It might even say that on the certificate on the bottom, where the address and the name of the association is. That is not adequate.” - Ed Hammel, Sachs Sax Caplan
Once a vendor checks out, attention turns to the terms of the agreement itself. Regardless of the contract's size, three provisions form the non-negotiable core: insurance, indemnification, and termination rights.
Contractual indemnification obligates the vendor to protect the association if a claim arises from the vendor's work, thereby bringing the vendor's insurer into the picture. Termination rights determine how the association can exit an agreement, and for service contracts such as management, janitorial, or landscaping work, the ability to terminate without cause is the market standard because it avoids disputes over whether a stated cause was sufficient or cured. Construction contracts differ, since ending a project midstream usually carries high cost, so those agreements rely on other negotiated triggers instead.
Beyond the big three, a sound contract has to state the obvious in writing: the exact scope, the contract sum, and a clear timeline for ordering materials, obtaining permits, and completing the work. It is surprisingly common for an agreement to omit the total price or the completion date even when both parties believe those terms are understood. Details such as unit prices and allowances, which reserve a placeholder amount for items like flooring that will be selected later, also belong in the document so the numbers stay transparent as the project evolves
In Florida, any project with outdoor exposure needs to address what happens when a storm threatens the site. Agreements for work exposed to tropical storms and hurricanes should state who is responsible for securing the property when a warning is issued and at whose expense, rather than leaving that question open during an active season. Building those contingencies into the contract keeps an emergency from becoming a second dispute.
On higher-value work, bonds add a layer of security beyond insurance and indemnification by putting a surety behind the project.
A performance and payment bond backs both the completion of the work and the payment of subcontractors and suppliers, typically costing between one and three percent of the contract value. If a bonded contractor fails or disappears mid-project, the surety steps in to see the work finished, which is why these bonds warrant serious consideration on six- and seven-figure jobs. The board ultimately decides whether the added cost is justified, but that decision should be made with a full understanding of the protection involved.
Two related instruments cover narrower risks. A supply bond protects large deposits on custom or special-order materials, guaranteeing the association's money when a substantial payment goes out before delivery. A warranty bond extends surety protection into the later years of a contractor's warranty, since a standard performance bond generally backs the warranty only through the first year after completion; many communities weigh this against the added cost, but understanding the option matters when a long warranty is central to the deal.
The strongest contracts layer these safeguards so a remedy is always available when something goes wrong. Retainage, the right to withhold payment, the right to stop work, the ability to pay subcontractors directly, and a surety standing behind the project all stack together into a set of options counsel can draw on for whatever dispute arises. Rather than relying on a single protection, this layered approach gives the association room to respond without immediately resorting to litigation.
A contract should reach the association's attorney before it goes to the board for approval, not after. An early community association contract review keeps revisions organized and heads off avoidable mistakes.
When counsel handles the first pass, insurance, indemnification, and other core provisions are revised in a single coordinated effort rather than pieced together from competing rounds of comments. Even when knowledgeable attorneys or engineers serve on the board or a committee, letting the association's own counsel and manager review first tends to be faster and cleaner. That professional input remains valuable, but it works best layered on top of a professional review rather than ahead of it.
On complex projects, a contract can go through many rounds of revisions, and it is essential that the version ultimately signed is the final approved one. Clear execution instructions, such as initialing each page and every exhibit, prevent an outdated draft from being signed by mistake. This discipline also guards against last-minute changes slipped into an agreement, such as a clause that would personally obligate the individual signing on the association's behalf.
The general terms and conditions, often printed in small type or tucked onto the back of a proposal, are where limitations on a vendor's liability and other unfavorable terms tend to hide. A contract that looks balanced on its face can still cap the vendor's responsibility at a token amount in a paragraph few people read. Reviewing that fine print closely is what keeps hidden exposure from surviving into a signed agreement.
Final authority over any agreement rests with the board, and the way a contract is approved matters as much as its terms. Those decisions belong in the open, at a meeting, and on the record.
Since the board acts through properly noticed meetings, a contract should appear on the agenda and be approved by a vote at a board meeting rather than through informal email agreement. Listing it on the agenda creates a clear record of when the agreement was considered and approved, which protects the board if the decision is later questioned. For condominium associations, a newer requirement to attach the contract to the meeting agenda adds a step, and for very long agreements a practical approach is to include the key pages with a link to the full document.
The board makes the business decisions, while management and counsel provide guidance, and that guidance should be documented in writing. When a board chooses to proceed against a recommendation, a brief written note confirming the advice protects everyone if a future board revisits the decision years later. Florida's business judgment rule generally shields good-faith board decisions, which makes a clear record of what was recommended and what was decided all the more valuable.
“We want to make sure it's documented, just in case somebody raises an eyebrow years later” - Ed Hammel, Sachs Sax Caplan
Even well-drafted agreements run into trouble, and how the association responds in the first days often shapes the outcome.
The single most important step when a contract goes wrong is to bring in counsel early, before attempting to resolve the dispute directly. Many contracts impose specific notice and cure obligations, and a board or manager acting alone can miss those steps and inadvertently put the association itself in breach. Early involvement lets counsel set up the claim correctly and preserve the association's remedies, including any surety obligations on a bonded project.
Phone calls and in-person conversations are easy to dispute, so every meaningful exchange about a problem should be confirmed in writing and preserved. Photographs of defective work, ideally taken by an engineer or consultant who can later verify them, strengthen the record considerably. Because these materials become part of the association's official records, keeping them organized also supports compliance long after the dispute is resolved.
Contracts frequently require that a default be documented and that specific parties, sometimes including the contractor's counsel or the surety, receive notice within a set number of days. Missing those deadlines can waive a claim or release a surety from its obligations, which is why the notice provisions deserve close attention the moment a problem appears. Insurance carriers should also be notified promptly, since late notice is a common reason a claim is denied.
The end of a contract's term deserves as much attention as its beginning, along with the way large vendors structure their standard agreements.
Florida law does not automatically renew a service contract when its term ends, so the agreement itself has to spell out what happens next. Automatic renewal clauses are worth striking or limiting, because a future board can easily lose track of an expiring contract and find itself locked into another multiyear term. When both sides want to continue on the same terms, a short written addendum extending the term is a cleaner solution than relying on an automatic rollover.
Large telecom, waste, and similar providers often reference terms and conditions through a link they reserve the right to change at any time. Allowing a live link to define binding obligations creates a serious problem if the agreement is ever disputed, since no one can prove what the link said years earlier. Printing those terms and attaching them as a dated exhibit fixes the agreement to a known starting point.
For an HOA management agreement in Florida, or a security services contract, terminating without cause is the customary market standard, and agreements limited to termination for cause invite disputes over whether cause existed. Some providers reasonably ask for a short initial window before a without-cause right takes effect, which can be a fair compromise. What a community should avoid is a long-term agreement it can exit only for cause, since that structure makes a clean separation difficult.
Florida's construction lien law adds a layer of risk that makes payment documentation especially important on any building project.
Contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and laborers all hold lien rights under Florida law, so every payment to a general contractor should be accompanied by releases of lien from the contractor and everyone working beneath them. Confirming that each party has been paid protects the association from a lien filed over money it believed was already distributed. Skipping this step is how a fully paid project can still end up encumbered.
The stakes are higher for condominiums, because a lien arising from an association contract can attach to every unit rather than to a single parcel of commonly owned property. That means one dispute can cloud title across the entire community and hold up sales for unrelated owners. An unconditional payment bond is especially valuable here, since it moves lien claims off the real property and onto the bond.
“An unconditional payment bond removes the lien rights from the real property and puts it against this bond.” - Ed Hammel, Sachs Sax Caplan
Strong contracting is less about any single clause than about a consistent, disciplined habit: putting every agreement in writing, confirming the vendor behind it, layering protections that match the risk, and keeping a clear record of who decided what. When boards and managers treat managing contracts as an ongoing part of smart association management rather than a scramble at signing time, agreements become a quiet source of stability, protecting the community's finances and keeping its projects on solid ground for years to come.
The right amount scales with the project's scope and risk, so a brief, low-risk service call warrants far lower limits than high-rise concrete restoration involving scaffolding. On larger projects, substantial umbrella liability coverage is expected in the market, and a contractor without it is a warning sign worth taking seriously.
Only in a narrow situation. Contracts are normally approved by a vote at an open board meeting, but when there is pending or threatened litigation, the board may act in a closed, attorney-client session and then ratify and announce that decision at the next open meeting.
The association should decline to proceed on a verbal or one-page understanding and insist on the essentials in writing first, including price, timing, and the core insurance, indemnification, and termination terms. Even a small job left undocumented can expose the community to paying twice or arguing later over what was actually agreed.
Stay connected with our blog for expert perspectives, industry updates, practical resources, and highlights from our educational webinars.
Ashley Dietz is the VP of Marketing at Campbell Property Management and has led the company’s educational and marketing initiatives since 2013. A Florida Atlantic University graduate with a bachelor’s degree in communications, Ashley specializes in community association education, digital outreach, and industry engagement for Florida HOAs and condominiums.